Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
tapasco
tapasco
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 52
    • Issues 52
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • tapasco
  • tapascotapasco
  • Issues
  • #124

Closed
Open
Opened Jul 26, 2017 by Jaco Hofmann@jahOwner

Evaluate 64 bit for platform_addr_t

All platforms except for legacy Zynq, such as the PCIe based systems or MPSoC, use larger than 32 bit addresses. While we currently get by with smaller addresses this might change in the future and we should consider a move to 64 bit addresses.

I currently don't see any problem just changing the address width. The Zynq platform should continue to work with the required casts and all other platforms currently cast to 64 bit addresses anyway.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: tapasco/tapasco#124